I did read it

But not the part where it said the sweeping majority of 9000 some odd separate BLM protests were peaceful nor how some of these deaths were simply protest adjacent, like your folks with the heart attacks and amphetamine addiction. Which is besides the fact that not all of the demonstrations discussed were BLM specifically.

I know you read the headline, but clearly not much else.

You're the one acting like you have me in a corner

Don't stand in a corner with an article you didn't read all the way through and maybe I'd seem less daunting to you.

You obviously don't want to look your argument in the face , realizing it's complete trash

Is a hell of a projection, because I substantiated my premise with facts; facts which were further corroborated by your own source for your opinionated counterpoint..

Are you done here?