I don't think we should consider sjws as feminists.

None includes male victims forced to perform penetrative vaginal, anal or oral sex.

I already addressed that.

Rainn's infographic about rape statistics with male survivors relies on a report that defines rape as "forced vaginal, oral, and anal sex," which may not include envelopment but includes more than just sodomy.

A lot of the US states laws on sodomy for instance included oral sex in their definition of sodomy

And they no longer do that. I'm more than willing to be proven wrong here but can I charge someone with sodomy today if oral sex has been forced?

Can you point me towards any feminist (or any at all) organizations who include men being made to penetrate as rape in the rape statistics they presents in their material?

I don't study feminist organizations and I'm not involved with one so I don't have an answer to this. I think the fact that feminists campaigns got the FBI to even acknowledge that the rape of men occurs was a big step for an ideology that supposedly is only interested in women.

Have there been any studies other than the self-reported survey of the NISVS that has statistics on how many men have been made to penetrate? A cursory Googling showed statistics that ranged from 7% to 50%.

Nicola Gavey and her treatment of male victimization in her book "Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape" is one example.

I've never heard of her.

Mary P. Koss

isn't very relevant in academic feminism

Apart from Lara Stemple

I also have never heard of her. The point I was trying to make is that there's no way you can make the claim that "most academic feminists believe that a woman forcing a man to have sex is not rape" unless you have actually heard most academic feminists say that they believe that a woman forcing a man to have sex is not rape. Not saying anything about the rape of men does not equal not believing it happens.

/r/FeMRADebates Thread Parent