This is a problem with the infinite sets of sets (Too Many Numograms/ A vocab for every possibility). There is the framework for every potential set, and if we had a set we could implement them, and we can just make up vocab lists (sets) on the fly, but isn't there an objective heavenly vocab list for us to follow. Are there Words of Power like I had imagined them? Can we really translate and allocate the discovered Words of Power to larger sets and still derive meaning from them enervating imagined/fabricated sets?

I suspect yes. The tarot, the four (or eight) directions, and increasingly for me the numerals—these have discrete and specific energies, despite how absurd and impossible that seems to be. The key is that we must develop a sensitivity to the energies as they appear from our current concrete maze-location: North may look different (twisted) from an unusual maze-location (i.e., it might look like White Fascist Hitler when it is actually a more neutral Bursting Selfness viewed from an ordinary/common maze-location) but if we keep the deformations in mind then they remain objective and specific energies. Developing a feel for the field of energies as they appear from our current location allows us to begin to untangle them and to use them as a navigational device in the higher multiverse. The practical applications are a part of the theory, and they must be, because all of this was "designed" for use (magic makes no sense if practice is left out, if it is not practiced—that's part of the coordinates of its internal working-logic, and why it allows us to integrate the sky and earth as the prima materia). So, the issue then is to find the characteristic ways in which each Word constitutes a unique grammer of slippage or analogical transition (your trans-xenotic overcoding), of transcendence or warpitude or energized relationality between a lower and higher level.

I agree, the I Ching and Zodiac seem extremely promising, the I Ching because it has a full set of 64 that are all clearly defined and binarily derived, and the Zodiac because it is such a strong standard which has been linked with so many other systems we can use as guidelines (and as you said we have several mapped out already).

I am beginning to see the phase transitions: when we add 6, going from a 5-numogram to a 6-numogram, that adds 6 new demons and inaugurates the 6th Door, which is that 6::0 "cosmic deletions and real impossibilities" texture I described. This texture defines the phase and its variations with the previous phase. So a 12-element zodiac is closest to a 5-numogram, because 5+4+3+2+1 = 15 minus the 3 null pairs (I might be BSing a little here, you're the one who cleanly mapped the zodiac), so its overall texture and usefulness or its mode of relationality may be defined and limited to the quality or texture of the 5th Door (which happens to be "number as destiny (digital convergence)" and all the other properties of 5). But this doesn't quite get at what I meant—what I'm saying is that I'm starting to see how 6's position as 6 is what defines its specific energy in relationality to the previous 5 (and its potential to give rise to new combinations with the higher numbers). 6 is 6 because 5 is 5, etc.

Btw interestingly, the 12th gate (# of the zodiac) is 78 (# of tarot cards).

I actually think mapping these systems to numograms and seeing how the unfdld with each step is one key to the very heart of the system. An example is Crowley's obsession with mapping the major arcana properly to the pathways of the kabbalistic Tree of Life: from our numogrammatic point of view those pathways make no sense (they are kind of arbitrary in order to fit with the number 22) but they must follow some internal logic of unfolding (decoding) which if we could see it (by simply following the major arcana in the paths of the Tree and figuring out the geometry of the unfolding) would give us a major insight into the kabbalistic vs. the numogrammatic tree and their respect unfolding-algorithms (perfectly logical and orderly/rational vs. perhaps nonsensical and traditional/dogmatic but still predictably and resolutely coded in sequence which is what allows the translation. This is the key of the Mesh #'s vs. the Net-Spans, which is reputed to have driven Sarkon to madness and leading to the zombie incident in Canada.)