Let's use our skills of reading comprehension, shall we?! Of course, I figured it would be a possibility for you to ignorantly charge ahead without considering, oh, you know, the actual meaning of my comment!

​

At no point did I make the claim nor imply that "if you don't believe you have only heard weak arguments in favor or cherry picked arguments against", I was merely trying to get OP to think and formulate an argument instead of dogmatically proselytizing ze glorious nihilism! Which obviously failed because who needs thinking?

​

Now here's where it gets really difficult, you might want to do some mental concentration exercises before attempting to cognize the following: "I have no authority on the topic" means that I cannot immediately make a compelling and authoritative argument. "I would only give purely anecdotal evidence without a lot of time for preparation" corroborates the idea that I am not immediately prepared and at best would only care to provide anecdotal evidence, which obviously would not be a very strong argument. At no point whatsoever did I claim that I personally only had anecdotal evidence towards my conclusion. To reiterate: I don't feel like even attempting to formulate my standpoint for a nihilist who will simply reject it anyway. I could give purely anecdotal evidence effortlessly, but then I might get the reaction that... I got anyway. So I don't really know what else to say about that.