Are you suggesting "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" strategy? That's the closest strategy I see. Yes and no, mostly yes. Using biological analogies, symbiosis is fine for all involved, until the mutual benefit vanishes and suddenly one party is pondering whether to let the cooperation charade go on while the other is contemplating eating the other party. On the other hand, straight up "I'm here for parasitism - to siphon your resources without offering anything" won't cut it. A human analogy is difficult to come up with, but imagine me going to stormfront and saying "the ethnostate is cool guys but let us in too". Instead, what should occur is parasitism that hides under the guise of symbiosis. Pretend to be on their side, exchange benefits regularly, give peace offerings as needed, call out your side's radical extremists and demand the other side do the same - but be prepared for the other party to screw you over at any moment. And likewise, pay respects to mutual benefit and cooperation but be prepared to go against your word to screw the other party when the opportunity arises, and do it in a way it permanently cripples them without the chance for a retaliation. This is a purely academic exercise. I don't see any real life applications of any of this as it relates to media emasculation.
To be honest, I can't pretend that I don't see emasculating portrayal of European men, I mean, you see the ads, I posted. Some of that stuff is straight up subversive brainwashing. Sex-ed manuals? Impotence implications?
especially in a country like Germany. The country goes to the other extreme to make themselves not look like the Nazi. White guilt is a powerful thing, and my personal belief is that Guilt society plus Original Sin plus Pathological Altruism combine to create a potent self-flagellation nobody else comes close to. I've heard about the German Nazi disavowal a lot, if you could elaborate your experiences that'd be cool. I've heard the migrant crisis is directly linked to Germany's postwar guilt, for example.
Maybe that's why some are using Asian women as a substitute? Le "white women are disgusting masculine she-beasts tainted by feminism who don't know their place anymore, Asian women are docile submissive feminine angels not ruined by feminism and still know how to treat their men" etc. That they are honorary Aryans or "inferior but substitute white women" Another viewpoint, of course is that they cannot sexually compete for white women, hence they, in the words of a famous Aussie woman "gotta get a gook"
On the flip side, are American men soft and naïve? Many Asian women think so. According to Jenny, who moved to the U.S. from Taiwan in her 30s, "For those Caucasian guys who like Asian women, their personality tend to be softer. They're not very masculine." Another interview subject, who moved to the U.S. for, and later divorced, an American white man, found them "simple" and "less sophisticated" than Asian men. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/askmen/asian-women-and-white-men_b_2781887.html
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ&t=13s https://www.bitchute.com/video/bN6utGHU2NDi/