Those are only true examples of socialism because you have no fucking idea what those societies looked like.

It is literally a "god of the gaps".

Look at how everyone stops using Catalonia as an example when they realize Catalonia had money, a little bit of slave labor, and the execution of thousands of innocent people.

Similarly, look at how everyone will stop using the zapatistas when they realize that they are just a bunch of indigenous people who don't even have electricity. If Chiapas is a true anarchist society, why aren't you people moving there? You realize that the zapatistas are still there right?

How the heck is Christiania a socialist society? It's a community of less than 900 people inside a massive capitalist society. It is literally a "hippie village", a place for drug users and such that produces nothing valuable. If we took this community and isolated it from the capitalist world, they would starve to death. I wonder how many people there live within the Denmark welfare system.

As soon as you get a picture of what those societies looked like, it stops being true socialism, just like the USSR, or Cuba, Or North Korea, or old China, or Vietnam, or the Indian socialists movements, or the Venezuelan socialist movements. Is is only true socialism when you have very little information about it.

Why don't you move to rojava? Where the true socialists survive by selling large oil reserves to israel at a cheap price. Why don't you move to chiapas, where people live without electricity and many without a sewage system? Why don't we take a closer look at both of those? Do you realize they still exist right?