What would bother me most about this return:

$15 Mil in Government Contributions. That sounds like a potential 'conflict of interest'.

$9 Mil in speeches over 5 years, $3.6 Mil in 2014.

$138 Million invested in Buildings & Land. That's like 8,000,000 sq of ownership at $17 / sq ft. That's just a fuck ton of building spaces, for no real 'nonprofit purpose'.

Bruce Lindsey ~$400,000

Eric Braverman ~$533,000

Andrew Kessel ~$220,000 (Signer of the Tax Return)

$205,000 spent on Peter Comey's law firm (as reported by news)

Cheryl Mills is on the Board

And $12 Million spent on 'rallies', which would effectively double as political rallies. Most nonprofits have a more 'standard' function or service, but their nonprofit's 'expenses' are almost entirely on 'rallies' other than these $30 Mil or so in Salaries. The other thing they do is incorporate themselves into the schools, which again, effectively doubles as political campaigning.

If I was to look into this, I'd ask:

What are these $15 Mil government grants in 2014, from whom & when?

Breakdown of these $3.6 Mil in speeches 2014 (same)?

What the fuck are you doing with a $138 Mil building? Where is this and what function does it serve?

What the fuck are you doing with $30 Mil in salaries, considering they have no 'ongoing' functions (everything is rally based)?

If I was these countries, I'd not want the Clinton's influencing the younger population, but that's just me. Reeks of 'political maneuvering , regime change'.

Lastly, I would want video tape of all these rallies. The opportunity to mix in a political message is too damn convenient, considering it mirrors the exact appearance as a political convention. With $12 Million spent on meetings and conventions, at say $30 a head, that's 400,000 expected attendance. I suspect you'll find they had far, far less attendance than that.