I browse the sub often, but not often enough that I'd catch everything like that, nor have I been in the sub for all of December, so yes it is very easy to not have seen any info on this, contrary to your assumptions.

I never said I didn't make a mistake, that fact is a given. However Disney takes part of this blame for the reasons I've already listed, and the fact that multiple guests around me expressed surprise as well makes it a hard argument to have that this is the guests mistake alone.

I know you want to defend Disney and that somehow my post painting Disney in a negative light has ruffled some feathers in here, but I always try to see the picture from both sides, and in this case it is clearly a weakness in Disney's side that could use some improvement. I learned a few things and will obviously be able to correct for this next vacation, but let's leave the aggressive defense of Disney to the wayside please?

I know it would have made the perfect counter to my argument, but you jumped to an ill informed conclusion.

I visit this sub often, but no where near as often as my other subs, and yet instead of asking 'how often?' you just go 'Oh! I got him now!' and jump to conclusions because it fits an easy picture you want to paint to make me look like I am in the wrong 100%.

Obviously I didn't visit often enough to see any posts about the christmas party, and in fact I haven't been on this sub in the past month recently, but sure let's jump to conclusions... smh

Just admit that Disney has a lack of communication with people who purchase their tickets through various means, and that the fault does not lie squarly with visiting guests. It's absolutely rediculous to expect everyone to do the amount of research that is needed, nor expect everyone to even know they need to do research like that in the first place. It's also ridiculous to pay full price for a park that isn't open for the full normal operating hours, and there is no way you are going to defend that and not sound like a Disney fanboy.

How do you take 'come on this sub often', and turn it into a scientific 100% conclusion that that must include the exact day some posts about the party or that it was sold out hit the front page?

I have NOT seen those posts, so your entire conclusion is fabricated non-sense created because it sounds all too convenient to fit the image you are trying to paint

I come on often but not THAT often, but sure, let's take that into your own context and just assume that means I must have seen those particular posts...

That is not how it works.