fatFIRE doctors: if money was no object, which add'l preventative tests or healthcare programs would you order?

I just don't understand how "research that increased medical testing beyond standard guidelines in asymptomatic patients has no impact on patient mortality" is seen as the one-punch knockout in this argument.

I think it is ridiculous to expect extraordinary outcomes from loading up on tests or screenings. And I think it is silly when people think it's a good idea. But if there is a situation when it does make sense for an individual, it would have nothing to do with decrease mortality rates, it would be for emotional or psychological reasons.

Also, just as ridiculous as assuming way more tests could be done with major improvements in outcomes if it wasn't for the cost, is assuming that there is never a situation when money is a factor in medicine or in the frequency of screenings/tests.

/r/fatFIRE Thread Parent