Fully qualify for all technical definitions of art [followed by various random, uncited, definitions of art in general, not relating visual arts]

It sure does! Thanks for those definitions! Now can you define "kitsch"?!?

Every single art style has had critique [...] Modern, realism, dance.

Neither modern, nor realism, nor dance are "art styles", you drooling blithering illiterate. Modern art is a period, not a style; realism is a descriptor, not an art style; dance is an art form, not an art style.

Learn a little of art history - be capable of distinguishing Rembrandt from Rothko - and then use that trite word, "snob", that so immediately betrays your absolute illiteracy on the subject (emphasized by the incredibly stupid definitions you pasted).

My "tastes" don't define kitsch. The nauseating drivel posted here does. r/art defines "kitsch."

I don't believe my "tastes" are "superior". I believe your knowledge of any art history is nill.

You really don't know how boring you are because of your incredibly limited knowledge on historical and contemporary debates on art and theory. Just know that people that are truly interested in art wouldn't waste their breath. I know I just did.