Finally, the NY Times says "Red Scare"

it’s always just race “realists” making increasingly bold attempts to revive a discarded ideology by giving it some sort of continuity with contemporary science and liberals desperately denying legitimate research and moralizing instead of making any sort of meaningful criticism of the whole program.

It's only boring because that's the form it takes, because there's relatively little public discussion of it because it's been risky to engage in it. So we end up with IDW IQ fags (Harris, Murray, etc) on the one hand and Progressive Anti-Racists (Ezra Klein, T'Challa Coates) on the other. The former suffers from misplaced emphasis, the latter from pure mushy-headedness. There's lots of potential for useful syntheses there, believe it or not.

in the end the furthest they can possibly get is to come to the conclusion that certain races are objectively inferior and deserve to be subjugated,

That's .... why? Silly-talk.

/r/redscarepod Thread Parent Link - nytimes.com