I once read an article about how women were more likely to abuse their children than men, and throughout the entire article the author was tying to justify it by saying that it’s because mothers are stressed or pass abuse led her to abuse her children. but if it was a man, there would be no excuse. But to radfems, women are angels and men are terrible demons.

What a dumb way to go about excusing it. The more sensible way would just be to go

"Which is likely correlated with the fact most mothers are the primary caregiver meaning there's more time spent with the child both good and bad, meaning the mothers are going to cause abuse at a higher rate due to the simple fact it's rather hard to abuse someone if you're not even around, like so many dead beat dads."

Not the best wording but I'm not spending more than 30 seconds on this hypothetical. But it's a much better way to try and excuse it and pin it on men at the same time.

It doesn't even excuse it, it just implies men would be abusing their kids but they're to shit to even be around their kid in the first place.