Folk medicine is inferior

Folk medicine and modern medicine are two different approaches to healthcare, with their own strengths and weaknesses. While modern medicine is based on scientific evidence and is practiced by trained healthcare professionals, folk medicine has some potential advantages, including:

Accessibility: Folk medicine remedies are often readily available, affordable, and easy to access. This can be especially important for individuals who live in remote or underserved areas and may not have access to modern medical facilities or medications.

Cultural relevance: Folk medicine remedies are often deeply rooted in the culture and traditions of a particular community. This can make them more culturally relevant and acceptable to individuals who may be hesitant to use modern medicine.

Holistic approach: Folk medicine often takes a more holistic approach to healthcare, focusing on the overall well-being of the individual and the prevention of illness. This can include practices such as meditation, yoga, and dietary changes, which can promote overall health and well-being.

It is important to note, however, that the effectiveness of folk medicine can vary depending on the specific remedy or practice. Some folk remedies may be effective in treating certain conditions, while others may not be scientifically validated or may even be harmful. The most important thing about both of them, though, is that they can both be beneficial to different circumstances. For instance, someone dying of polio most likely isn't going to be healed of it through folk medicine, as it is a very complex disease. Headaches, bone breakages, or even bleeding, however, are things that someone who is into folk medicine could potentially excel at.

/r/u_Dry-Relationship6659 Thread