Trump advocates for war crimes and his only solution during the campaign was "bomb the hell out of them". Just because the guy has never had the opportunity to start a war, and doesn't articulate what he'll do in a war, doesn't mean he won't start one, and given his rhetoric, he would certainly like to.

He's had multiple opportunities to start a war with Assad already, the chemical weapons attack a few months ago and three seperate military provocations by regime forces against US special forces embedded with rebels at al-Tanf. If Hilary was in office we would have flattened Syrian airfields with bombs and continued supplying TOW missiles to Islamist rebels.

While I don't agree with meddling in Libya, it wasn't as destabilizing as people pretend it was.

You must be joking. The nation is divided in half between Islamist militias who were butthurt about losing an election and government forces led by Gadafi loyalists. IS had a foothold in the country until they were driven out through bloody urban combat with government forces in Sirte and Benghazi. African slaves are being sold in open air markets in Libya now and hundreds of refugees fleeing Libya are drowning making perilous voyages to Europe. Libya was nothing less than an unmitigated disaster, Hilary helped turn one of the most developed nations in the ME into an Islamist hellhole.

Iraq, was a bad mistake, but keep in mind at that point congress was lied to about weapons of mass destruction. Hillary may not be a dove, but the way people present her as a war monger is completely absurd.

Even if Saddam did have chemical and biological weapons who cares? He had a record of killing Islamist terrorists as a secular nationalist dictator and we were best pals with him while he used chemical weapons to gas Iranian troops in the 80's. Hilary's vote for war in Iraq didn't prove she was a warmonger on its own, but together with Syria and Libya the picture is now clear.