This is certainly not wrong information.

As for calling a single sub-page on my website a "product" - now that IS ridiculous - what on earth are you talking about?

It's a tiny supplementary tool on an obscure page on my website - that I shared for anyone who *might* find it useful.

Clickbait?

Good god man. What a title that explains exactly what the post contains? I don't think you understand what the term clickbait means.

​

I put the tool together as a simple and quick additional extra to my site - I find it functional and useful, and I thought I may as well share it. I've used the digital watch and text test for decades with huge success - as have many of my students, there is enough citizen-scientist data to conclude that text is generally unstable in dreams.

For the record, linking to a bunch of forum posts is not evidence - if you consider it to be then you'll find a higher preponderance of evidence that text is generally unstable in dreams.

​

I'm done with this conversation, people like you are a tiresome waste of energy - I have better things to be doing than arguing with someone with such little decorum or manners.

You're making a mountain out of a molehill - and I couldn't disagree with your excessive attack on a single simple webpage based on a generally agreed upon aspect of the dreamscape.

​

I'm deleting this thread as people like you are what is wrong with the lucid dreaming community and I'm not doing my bit to give *your* misinformation a platform. Morphing text is a staple lucid dreaming test, whether it is expectation driven or not (I see no reason why it should be), its usefulness as a reality check has been verified by thousands of dreamers.

​

​