That report could be carried out with any politician and you'd get simillar results.

You didn't even fucking bother to read it did you?

"The results of this study show that Jeremy Corbyn was represented unfairly by the British press through a process of vilification that went well beyond the normal limits of fair debate and disagreement in a democracy. Corbyn was often denied his own voice in the reporting on him and sources that were anti-Corbyn tended to outweigh those that support him and his positions. He was also systematically treated with scorn and ridicule in both the broadsheet and tabloid press in a way that no other political leader is or has been. Even more problematic, the British press has repeatedly associated Corbyn with terrorism and positioned him as a friend of the enemies of the UK. The result has been a failure to give the newspaper reading public a fair opportunity to form their own judgements about the leader of the country’s main opposition."

He definitely deserves to be called out in this instance. Inexcusable behaviour

You are automatically assuming that it is true based on un-evidenced claims. If true then he deserves to be called out but there is no proof that it is true.