You lay the claim of moral relativism as though it were an accusation, rather than something he'd readily admit.

Whether or not my "accusations" are something that Greenwald would "readily admit" I think is irrelevant.

Here is an example of what I think is Greenwald's misinterpretation of some of Sam Harris's statements.. Here's part of the transcript of a discussion between Greenwald and the host for Secular Talk:

and you know in the recent exchange that sam Harris had with the training Noam Chomsky you know he identified the United States is what he called a well-intentioned giant and he said very much the same thing about it is that I guess United States and Israel might do some bad thing things but we're morally superior to you adversaries of the United States and Israel and so when I think it's an parents what I see is a person who is Eric and his a westerner he's a self-identified [Jew], he runs around making the argument that the United 9:59States and Israel are morally superior to its adversaries and you know it to me 10:04this is just kind of pure primitive tribalism it's sort of like the nub of 10:09what has driven the war on terror for the last fifteen years the idea that you 10:14sure we do some bad acts but we do it by accident we do it because we're really 10:17building tension the true evil is that and I think the reason that it's gotten