For the same reason the left denies the usefulness of Nuclear Energy and GMOs

Except they fucking don't you imbecile. You've seemingly made this up.

A) nuclear energy is not cost-competitive nor will it ever be cost-competitive. Republicans refusing to regulate fossil fuels is actually a major reason it's not cost-competitive. This whole "the left is why we no have nuclear" meme is completely fabricated:

http://ansnuclearcafe.org/2012/09/18/the-party-platforms-on-energy-and-nuclear/

B) The left does not deny GMOs. You're confusing fringe greentards with the mainstream left. Obama literally signed a law basically banning the labeling of GMOs.

Could you be clear on the flaws of the article?

I just fucking gave you the flaws. They're conflating gas companies hedging their bets for gas companies being supportive of green energy.

China is building +20 reactors right now, that´s absolutely not true. If affordability is an issue, than remember that fossil fuel is the cheapest source of energy.

Oh wow, what a shocker, you have no fucking clue what you're talking about in relation to China either, who could have predicted that.

A) https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612564/chinas-losing-its-taste-for-nuclear-power-thats-bad-news/

B) Fossil fuels are a prime reason nuclear is not even close to cost-competitive. Know what else is super cheap and getting cheaper? Fucking solar and wind.

Take your time and see all the opposition throughout Europe and supported by groups like Greenpeace.

I don't give a shit about Europe. We're talking about the united states, that was the entire context of this.

I´ve been trying to debate this on the most wholesome way, it seems you´re more interested in showing that I´m wrong than exchanging ideas. So, have a nice day trying to gather supporters while cursing randomly at regular individuals.

Don't want nor need your support.