I guess I'm the Social Justice comic now.

...? You were the one who brought up the military. I literally don't care about that, whoops.

Sure, sure. You didn't care so much you made an argument, discovered it didn't have any credibility, and then retreated into "LOLwhatever"dom.

(But with the advent of powered exoskeletons that eliminate any need for natural strength, who's to say?)

Yeah...except that, 1) they don't, and 2) they don't exist yet. If the standard combat load is ~80 pounds, which it is, and an exoskeleton can effortlessly carry, say, 300 pounds, then the new exoskeleton combat load would be, you guessed it, 380 pounds. The military isn't going to say, "Well, shit, that's good enough, why use all our capacity?"

1.) Women do not have as many contributions to recorded history as men do. 2.) Clearly it is because they were inferior!!!! (and not because they were systematically excluded from being in any positions to make these contributions)

You're making my point for me, and don't seem to realize it. They lacked the strength and capability to prevent themselves from being systematically excluded. You cannot keep someone just as strong and capable as you under your thumb for the entirety of human existence.

There are multiple people on Reddit who think your views are noxious. SHOCK.

They're pretty small in number, fortunately, and they hang out in havens of unintentional hilarity like SRS.

There is literally no cognitive dissonance to recognize that different people have different experiences, and a bright young freshman who wants to be a biologist and a girl getting hooked on barbiturates and effectively raped on camera have nothing in common other than their gender.

Well, sure. I mean, shit, I remember when I spontaneously developed my barbiturate addiction. I didn't make any active choice to, you know, start doing barbiturates. Your argument is that women should be protected from the consequences of their decisions because they're women. That's inherently sexist.

"You want there to be stronger regulations on predatory for-profit schools like DeVry/University of Phoenix? YOU MUST BE AGAINST ALL HIGHER EDUCATION THEN LOL COGNITIVE DISSONANCE LOL"

Not quite. See, there's a difference between DeVry/University of Phoenix and legitimate institutions of higher education. You know, like there are differences in the strengths and capabilities of men and women. In supporting stronger regulations against the DeVry-like institutions of the country, I can acknowledge that inferiority.

The proper analogy would be you arguing for stronger regulations on DeVry while shrieking that it's just as good as Harvard.

I'm done responding to your blatantly bigoted ass. I have to actually go to work in the morning, I don't get to stay online and talk about how inferior women are all day.

That's ironic, given that I was gone all day after my initial comments in this thread and you were here the whole time. If you're trying to pull the, "I'm not just another Starbucks barista, I have a real job!" card, you might want to make sure your account history doesn't make it an obvious lie.

/r/standupshots Thread Parent Link - imgur.com