Actually, the entire brunt and focus of your message was false. Let's look again at what you posted;

1) There are hundreds of MILLIONS of women in Africa who are circumcised.

This is a drastic exaggeration, used to try and overstate the proportions and saturation of FGC as a problem. Off the bat you're "spreading misinformation" for the sake of pushing this narrative that FGC is somehow light years removed from MGC in terms of history, rationale, prevalence or anatomical/physiological consequence.

2) Female circumcision can completely remove or seriously dampen a woman's ability to feel any type of sexual pleasure, which is not anywhere close to the same ballpark as the effect of male circumcision.

Emphasis my own. Yet again, completely overstated and oversimplified for the purpose of "proving" that FGC is worse (as if it really matters anyways), with the emphasized portion being blatantly wrong.

FGC is not always catastrophic to sexually function, and in fact often is not catastrophic at all. The most commonly performed types of FGC are the most minor, which are very easily in line with or less damaging than the average case of MGC.

Just do a google search before posting such blatant misinformation.

Finally, a personal shot as if you stand on some academic high ground here, and are enlightening the viewers around you.

So tell me again how nothing that you posted was false? Sure, when you actually take your points in a reasonable context, and provide them a proper framework they might be correct, but that's not even close to what you did, nor were trying to do here. Instead you took a bunch of media buzzword factoids and hobbled them together as an argument.

Next time, before you decide to get self-righteous about things you really obviously aren't educated on, you might want to look into them a bit further. It avoids you having to try and backpedal while pretending what you said, wasn't what you actually said.