I agree with this post 100%. It has always rubbed me the wrong way that you would suggest donating a shitty game. Y'know what that means? Giving needy kids a shitty game. It implies that "only poor kids deserve to play this game." Those needy kids might only get one game donated a year, if that, and what they get is the luck of the draw. How pissed would you be if you got a shit game and other needy kids got a sweet game?
The ratings should be:
Yeah, it's a little verbose, but it fits in better with the other ratings, and it doesn't imply that "poor kids will be happy with anything, even a shitty game."