The explanation on language wasn't relevant to what I said, though I do agree with it. I never said Language could accurately describe our world, I was saying language can change the way we think, which it definitely can. Did you read my examples of how you made presumptions about my beliefs because you labeled me? That's all I was saying.

What you're describing isn't a problem coming from philosophy

I've said that myself multiple times, it's a problem that applies to practically everything that uses labels to describe people including philosophy, religion, many professions, personal preferences, gender etc.

Again, read Bergson

I've read up on him and it's interesting but I don't agree with it. I think free will does not exist because the future is calculable, rather than already set in stone. I don't think it unravels into multiple possibilities, I believe there is only one possibly because I believe there is no such thing as true randomness. I don't see what point you're trying to make.

You put the emphasis on the way