I probably would struggle to produce that kind of result consistently for various reasons. I haven't trained in a long time, but also this is a very narrow experiment to validate what telepathy is.
I have trained with people far more adept than me. They could do what you asked. I've sat with people who knew everything about me, everything about their surroundings. They could describe buildings and architecture around them without seeing them visibly. They had a kind of radar like perception of their surroundings that penetrated walls and other physical objects. If someone was traveling to them, they could tell you where they are, what they are wearing as well as what they were thinking. I had my own ways of validating this. Our training hall was a scientific lab where I personally conducted experiments for a decade and recreated some of their abilities, albeit to a severely lesser degree.
But if you asked them if they could do any of this they would ask you what you are smoking. They don't want anyone to know unless it's in a training hall. My teacher described normal people as 'dust'. This is something you will never truly understand. These people do not care about you, or saving humanity. They dngaf. I can't stress this enough. They don't prescribe to societies concepts of ethics and morals. They have no obligation to you or anyone else. Normal life does not apply to them as it does for you. And yet they life entirely normal lives. You wouldn't notice them in the street.
I honestly don't know how to explain how this works to you because I would first have to tackle the belief you have that the scientific method you are accustomed to is the only one and true method. I'd have to deconstruct the limitations of this type of science. The limitations of rationality.
I'm talking to a person in a way that can see the visible spectrum of light and wants proof that the non visible spectrum of light exists, by measuring it from direct sight alone. You are asking the impossible and you don't want to accept this as the truth despite hearing it from multiple sources. This is not an intellectual phenomenon. If you want your own validation, you use the tools the same way as everyone else does. You do the experiments in the way that others to validate for yourself. You have to let go of your attachment to rationality and accept other modes of thought and awareness. If you don't want to accept this, then the onus is on you to create the tools to measure this using your own familiar scientific methods. Not other people.
It always comes back to the work and the fact that denier's don't want to do it.