That's for the victims to decide, no?

So victims of a crime are not to be critiqued regardless of what they do?

especially considering the context is infidelity and sending unsollicited nudes

When you are taking the high ground regarding an issue, your own moral actions do in fact matter. I don't see how sending unsollicited nudes is irrelevant when your complaint is that your nudes are being shared outside of private circles?!

Or do you mean:"I haven't personally seen them accept responsibility so I'm going to assume they haven't in private either"?

No. They publically have not accepted some personal responsibility outside of Sean Dhondt, eventhough people received these unsollicited disturbing images in their inbox and were being censored on social media to absurd extents.

So? Trying to censor private and personal information about oneself is fairly normal. I censor my personal and private information all the time.

Oh, you also have the power to censor social media to this extent and to stop the media from providing any form on details on these events while people were receiving these in their inboxes?

If you don't do such a thing, but instead try to find out more information, then you're a perverted person who is intruding upon someone's private life.

That's so insincere. Parasocial relationships are real and deserve their own context. You can't expect people to receive sexually explicit and disturbing content of people they think they know and not look for answers as to how and why. I don't know what you talk about with your friends or family, but I would certainly be upset enough to talk about it with them if I had gotten these in my inbox.