" nor is any movement associated with the "Death to pedophiles..." phrase."
He printed multiple t-shirts advocating that pedophiles be put to death by torture. He is the movement. It's not an obscure moral conundrum like it is for you, its clearly something this guy believes in, considering he printed out multiple fucking shirts with that statement on them.
Maybe he did it in hopes of inspiring random strangers to torture random pedophiles, but it should be pretty obvious to you hes hoping that it becomes some sort of legal precedent considering how obscure the first vision is. Also you claimed the statement on his shirt was political, which means you took it the same way I did (pertaining to law and punishment) MEANING ORGANIZED. You said that before I even commented you wingding.
Either way, whether hes hoping it's organized or not, that's besides my singular point that you've barley addressed in FOUR comments.
I agree it is political and controversial, so is the statement "Donald Trump should be tortured to death". That's not how you would characterize that statement though would you? If a politician made that statement you wouldn't be reading "political and controversial comments this morning from..." in the paper because though appropriate, those words are hardly concise. Most people would describe that statement as ignorant, or horribly offensive, not "political and controversial".
The comment I responded to was one where you accused a poster who called the shop owner, "immature and unprofessional", as "looking down on business owners who voice their controversial opinions". You accused the poster of only thinking he was "immature and unprofessional" just because it was an opinion he disagreed with. Ill quote you...
"Would you feel the same way if it was a controversial or highly politicized opinion that you agreed with?"- YOU
My response to you made the point that it wasn't about it being a controversial or political statement that he disagrees with, but about it being OFFENSIVE.
Implying that ANYONE deserves to be TORTURED to death, let alone advocating for it (printing t-shirts=advocating) is objectively offensive. THAT'S why he shouldn't wear it.
It has nothing to do with a disagreement of social policies, its gross and off putting. People should be able to expect to walk into a business without having to deal with things like that.