They do. We see it all the time. But I was here before, during, and after the campaign, and the idea that there were "Clinton apologists" is absolutely batshit. You couldn't post her name without getting downvoted to oblivion. Cut the bullshit.
They who? Because the Russians aren't the only ones spreading propaganda on social media. I just gave you proof of pro-Hillary dem establishment astroturf campaign on social media.
I was here before during and after the election and I saw the transition from pro-Bernie posts to Trump this and Trump that and any posts criticizing Hillary, DNC and dem leadership downvoted into oblivion.
You're very wrong here. There is proof that there were indeed these paid Clinton apologists on reddit during the time of the election and I think it's clear that it's still happening. In case you didn't know. David Brock is a propagandist who
I can say this because the contrast was the pro-Trump and "pro-Bernie" posts that were filled with either lies or bad faith arguments. Now that still stands out like a sore thumb.
No, it wasn't pro Trump. It was pro Bernie but the comment sections still had people vigorously defending Hillary.
Hillary DNC dem leader apologist stick out like a sore thumb because and listen closely. Post can be bought ans so can't upvotes. Posts being upvoted aren't proof of the base wanting it.
Just some bonus reading material for you.
https://jacobinmag.com/2017/05/shattered-hillary-clinton-campaign-defeat-trump
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/09/clinton-sanders-primary-new-book
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2018/05/hillary-clinton-amy-chozick-2016-election
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-apologies-email-213133