How about having a big enough opinion of yourself to stand by your statements.
Or, I have a big enough opinion where I don't need to be validated by you or anyone else.
r/politics didn't write the fucking article.
Of course not, that's not how this site works. I'm not an idiot. Read the comments and look at the vote count. People think it's fact and are eating that shit up.
Supporting Trump is saying "It's not racist" when everyone is saying "It's racist"
That's literally not logical. What /r/politics commenters say doesn't define reality. Seriously, wtf? And where did I say something wasn't racist?
I thought you didn't care...
Like I said, I care about getting banned from the other subs, which comes from the label.
and you responded as if they were demanding non stop denouncement.
Lol, you obviously didn't read the whole comment chain. The other guy literally said:
If he really wanted nothing to do with white supremacists he would be denouncing them as often as he does Hillary and Obama
My point was unrelated to how quickly he responded about the Nazis, which, if you read, I agreed that he handled it poorly. I was disagreeing with the concept of having to denounce hate groups constantly (he constantly bashes on Hilary and Obama). It's an insane request.
Like him, you don't understand that two unrelated thought can be held in a head. It's either "for trump" or "against trump". No thought about the concept within the argument.
Pretending that Trump's constant lies and criticisms of Obama are actually valid policy statements.
Hahaha, where the fuck did I say anything was valid policy!!?!!? I was saying that a president who had a previous opposing party will always criticize the previous president, Just as Obama did with Bush and his policies! That has **fuck all* to do with what I think valid criticism would be. Again, "for trump" or "against trump" mentality.
Suggesting that Nazis don't really support him. they are just doing it for the lulz
I wasn't talking about his delay in denouncing them. The guy was suggesting he should have denounced them before the event, because they supported him. If ISIS, or any other group, all the sudden supported him, should he start to denounce them immediately, every time he supported them? Of course fucking not! This is all completely unrelated to the delay in him denouncing nazis, which, again, I agreed was too long.
Ignoring him completely backtracking his previous denouncement of Nazis in order to keep fighting your strawman
I don't understand what you're even saying here. What I said has nothing to do with backtracking or denouncement of nazis. You're just making shit up.
You realize Nazi sympathizer does not mean Nazi right?
Yes, because it's easy to sympathize with people that want to burn your grandkids and daughter. Lol. I don't think he's a nazi sympathizer for that statement, I think he's a disgusting idiot republican using that disgusting moment as an opportunity to fling mud at the opposing party. You give him WAYYY too much fucking credit.
Fuck, I really don't care about this.