For his immigration with Muslims he doesn't want that permanently. Just until the middle east is more stabilized and he has a lot of support for that. I don't care myself one way or the other because I don't know what they know, but there is reasons we may not even know behind that.

Killing innocent people I consider cruel and unamerican. Also in the case of terrorism it is counterproductive to national security making us less safe. Terrorism is fueled by hate and drone bombing children is going to produce so much hate and isolate us from all of our allies. Plus it is a war crime which undermines our moral high ground which is barely there anymore after Iraq anyways. Religious discrimination is also unamerican.

I don't believe his goal is to intentionally kill innocent people. I believe if collateral damage results in that he thinks a strike is worth it anyway.

Remember a few years back Obama called for an air strike on a wedding in progress knowing full well many innocent people would die to take out one guy. I think we also bombed a couple of funerals as well.

Nobody hemmed and hawed then, so why now is this a major talking point? He wants to be proactive about terrorism not reactive.

I also don't believe terrorism increases over this as long as we are consistent. If we routinely blow up terrorist and anyone around them a message will be sent whether you hate us or not. That message will be if you harbor these people you are condining their behavior and guilty by association. As long as we bomb a little faster than they recruit their numbers by default will shrink and recruiting more will become harder because they know how we handle that behavior. We go in with no worries about who loses a life, we will find you and take you out along with anyone in your presence.

The innocent people that want to live will see the writing on the wall if we do this daily or weekly.