One organised the whole thing.
Verifiably untrue.
He mentioned only her with he talk to Camille Paglia
Not relevant as there was no 'response' in the video.
He didn't just randomly select someone who he felt was agitating against him
Not even logically coherent.
99% of people disagree with you in regards to this.
This does not mean their interpretation is correct. You're making another very basic logical error. Given that you literally and verifiably did not understand what he what he was talking about, you should see the problem with your reasoning.
did entirely different things.
lol
it being only the woman who organised the entire event.
Verifiably untrue.
If you were actually going to address the argument in an honest way you would be trying to justify why
Why he needs the capacity to respond with violence in response to non violent trespasses.
He responds in the same way to men and women trespassing against him, despite his claim to be limited in his capacity to respond to women.
Why non gendered social norms do not mitigate his gendered capacity to response to trespasses, invalidating thesis.