both played major roles i
This was justified with multiple pieces of evidence repeatedly.
both played major roles is retarded since she clearly played a bigger role than he did.
This is logically incoherent. Two people can play major roles without playing identical rolls. This is another basic logical error.
If you refuse to yield this point then I see no reason to waste more hours trying to get you to yield this one, simple, easy, obvious point.
LOL. And you were never actual able to address the core of the argument 13/10.
If you were actually going to address the argument in an honest way you would be trying to justify why
Why he needs the capacity to respond with violence in response to non violent trespasses.
He responds in the same way to men and women trespassing against him, despite his claim to be limited in his capacity to respond to women.
Why non gendered social norms do not mitigate his gendered capacity to response to trespasses, invalidating thesis.