I think everybody understands what he's saying, the problem is that it makes no sense.

If you're carrying in a state that allows private citizens to create Bill of Rights Free Zones and you decide to carry in one of those locations, yes, you are breaking the state law. If you have to use your gun in one of those locations, yes, it will probably be discovered that you were breaking the state law. And yes, the state may in that light decide that instead of the Second Amendment sometimes applying to you within the borders of the state (provided you have a current state-issued license, you're not on school property, you're not at a post office, you're at an anti-gun business, and it's been an even number of days since the last bank holiday), now it never applies to you within those borders. My question is: Who cares?

If you were the sort of person to value your rights over state law before getting caught, why would your values change afterward?