That's like saying just because some kids like chicken nuggets doesn't mean kids like chicken nuggets. Sure there are kids that don't like chicken nuggets, but that's not what McDonalds concerns themselves with. Same with the RP doctrine comment.
Wrong. Saying some kids don't like chicken McNuggets means some kids don't like chicken McNuggets. I am not the one generalizing here. YOU ARE. I am saying "some," as in "not all of them," as in "a portion of," or "a sample of" or "a few, but not the total of." YOU are the one who seems to think that equates to all and everything. Do you understand? Me saying it attracts "some" women is not the same as saying it attracts "all women." Please get that through your bony-ass head. This is not a hard concept to understand.
BTW, if McDonalds used your dumbshit logic, then they would only serve Chicken McNuggets. Last time I checked you could get a happymeal with a cheeseburger. Why? Because McDonalds knows that only some children like Chicken McNuggets.
Absolutely. Women eventually don't want to be one of the several and they decide to break relations. Spinning plates is a reference to the fact that women will only stay for so long without a LTR. That doesn't make the relationship unhealthy. Women can spin guys so long that they go into "orbit". Orbit implies that they will never fall. I would call that relationship unhealthy, but only to the guy that lets it happen.
In real life, it's a metaphor for how many plates you can keep spinning. The idea is that you're not serious about this girl, so you can, with a clear conscious, go out and fuck other women (sorry, I mean "plates.") The term itself is there to dehumanize the woman, because if she's just a "plate," then she doesn't deserve any loyalty. It's total misogynistic bullshit and is the very definition of unhealthy. Don't tell me that's not how Red Pillers treat "plates," because it is.
Let me ask, how many relationships with "plates" that you've had, have ended nicely? As in you and the woman both agree that the relationship is over, and no drama ensues? I'm going to take a guess and say that doesn't happen very often, does it? You know why? Because it's not fucking healthy.
What kind of responsibility are you talking about? Feminist seem to think that their happiness should be the responsibility of society. TRP says that feminism and society is what it is, and if you want to be happy then it's your duty to adapt.
I mean taking responsibility for the fact that the relationship failed is due to you, not because the woman was brainwashed by feminism into like, wanting to get a job and not instantly falling to her knees and handing out blowjobs on command. Everything the TRP exposes is designed to shield men from taking responsibility for anything - they can go out and have as much sex with as many women as they want, treat people like dogs, act like raging douchebags to get what they want, etc. But if a woman tries to do those same things, then holy shit hell no, she's an evil nazi femibitch brainwashed by commie feminists and is only after your sperm and your bank account.
The whole thing is complete and total 100% grade all horseshit.