completely agree. I mean lets say we put all of the video evidence that shows her enthusiastic demeanor and the mentioning of prior cam work aside (which is already overwhelming damning to her claims) ; Even if we were to take this story of hers at face value and assume the pretense of her ignorance about the nature of the modeling trip, you would have to be grossly reckless to just accept the tickets and accommodations without doing any research on what exactly that would entail. Also it sounds like regardless of the financial issues she mentions, a debt of a few thousand would not have been financially devastating enough to leave her or her caring family crippled so reimbursing GDP is definitely a better alternative then eventually coming to the (as she describes) absurdly farfetched belated conclusion that the trip is indeed about doing porn and then engaging in the act anyways. If she really didn't want to participate then Im positive she didn't have too. Im not saying women surrounded by men in these scenarios don't get pressured into compromising situations but GDP was on number 276. Its not their first rodeo. Im not saying GDP doesn't engage in any deception in getting these girls to agree to do the porn, who knows they might, but everything I can gather leads me to believe she's sensationalizing. The fact of the matter is, at a certain point whether it was early on or late in the game, OP knew what was going on and there were many opportunities to get out of it. but the money was good, she was already there, and now she doesnt like living with the repercussions. Or maybe she does? hell, the cynic in me thinks she could even be promoting herself in that market by drawing attention to it (the thing she claims is a source of terrible pain) And now in the era of outrage, why not capitalize on it by pandering for sympathy and attention under the guise of solidarity and retribution.