I fully and unashamedly oppose the idea of Islamic mass migration into foreign nations in numbers where the parent culture is threatened by said mass migration. I do, however, support Islamic migration on a responsible scale, which allows them to be forced to assimilate instead of establish parallel societies (no more than 3-5% of the population). I am literally proven correct on almost a daily basis.

And yes, it's totally okay to discriminate against a group of people's migration when they are members of an inherently destructive ideology which threatens the sovereignty of the nation they want to be a part of. Foreigners don't have a right to live in the United States. That's the basis of a nation's citizenship requirements, it must be earned.

It's totally okay to restrict migration policy when people lose their right to life directly because of a group of people who prove time and time again that they will kill and attempt to perpetuate their ideology. It's basic pattern recognition.

Taqiyya makes it too difficult to distinguish between the ones who want to assimilate and those who don't. (European mass migration has proven the grand majority don't). I also fully reject cultural egalitarianism, and the ideas that western nations must be multicultural. Western culture is great enough, thank you very much.

Everyone in the world does not have a right to live wherever they choose. I can't begin to explain how naive and out of touch with reality young westerners like yourself are on this issue. There is a reason why China is so aggressively anti-Islam, and why Japan doesn't allow mass migration whatsoever.

Funny story about Japan, out of the ~22 refugees they took, 2 were Turks and raped a Japanese girl within a month of landing.