I disagree with your ultra-capitalist approach.

It is not ultra-capitalist to say that the water Donald Trump needs to irrigate his golf courses is not a human right and that Nestle has no obligation to provide it to him for free so his rich customers can have pretty lawns. I disagree with your ultra-communist approach that says rich people have a human right to pretty lawns. It is not ultra capitalist to say that Alcoa does not have a human right to the massive amounts of water they need to manufacture aluminum and that if they want nestle to invest money in harvesting, treating, and delivering water they should pay market rates for it. It is Bat.Shit.Crazy to say corporations should get everything free and nestle should pay to deliver it to them. I'll bet you think food is a human right, therefore Cargill owes McDonald's free beef, slaughtered, butchered, packaged, and delivered. Cuz human rights! You fucking hippie dippies are infuckingsane. I have never heard you fuckwits squeal about your municipality sending you a water bill every month. Why don't you shit your progressivetard diapers about that? You think your city owes the local carwashes free water, delivered through a hugely expenive pipeline because "Nowhere in the resolution for human rights does it say "just the water you need for survival" is a human right. It says water is a human right. Period." And if the car washes can't get water from a munipality, nestle should harvest it, treat it, and deliver it through their own infrastructure for free. You are a fucking idiot.

Also, he is obviously not honest when he says he thinks the water piped into homes should bear the cost of the infrastructure. He wouldn't be interested if his company couldn't profit from it. And people already bear the cost of the infrastructure. It's called taxation. Taxation is money used to provide services whenever there is something that it is not ideal to make profits off of.

There is no infrastructure in the place he is discussing, you fuckwit. If the government was supplying tax funded water, he would not have proposed the project. And even if the government could supply water, if he can do it cheaper, what's the fucking problem? The people in that community were in crisis. People didn't have drinking water and industry was collapsing. And you hippie dippie fuckwits want the people to die of epidemic diseases for lack of water just so you can stop the firm that could solve the problem from getting a reasonable return on their investment on the open market. You are sickening.

I didn't say he said he wanted to own the rain. I said he wanted to own the rain.

This is way to moronic to respond to.

You keep referring to that Senate investigation into them, but that is about the deaths afaik, which I didn't even talk about. I'm talking about their extremely unethical, deceitful ultra-capitalist marketing strategies.

Nestle did not have any unethical or deceitful marketing practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. They did not have any marketing practices at all. They did not do business in sub saharan Africa. And they did not have unethical or deceitful marketing practices anywhere else. It's a fake story. Children died. It had nothing to do with nestle. You got tricked.

Also, I'm always surprised when American bring up Senate investigations. As if they don't already know how corrupt and bought their politicians are already.

You think Nestle "bought" Edward Kennedy? You think Edward Kennedy was "corrupt"? Based on what evidence? You're a sleazy fucking liar.