Oh, I guess it’s okay to violate the law and these girls’ privacy as long as they claim to be “pro-life”. Apparently being “pro-life” doesn’t stop people from neglecting and abusing toddlers to death.
No it means that it's unrelated. And still a false equivalence, these women intentionally stayed in the admins focus, once the children were released from state care they were under the care of the families..Who were tracked.. You're basically comparing something you can predict with a calender, to the real time tracking of people.. it's not the same but I've come to expect this from people with your arguments.
$750 a day is enough to buy all the supplies needed but the cruelty is the point.
Because building facilities and maintaining them and staffing them doesn't cost money. Either way.. greed, not concentration camp
Are you still worried about child sex colonies on mars?
That depends, you still think the president of the USA is a deep cover Russian spy
The lawyers had to force the camp to hospitalize dying babies.
No they did not. They brought it to their attention that they should be in hospital and the facility complied.. stop with the histrionic crap.. seriously. it's old.
Family separations aren’t unaccompanied minors.
And I bet you have some sort of citation for which is which... didn't think so. But don't let that stop you from implying implying implying....
Many of the children illegally taken from parents have been in facilities for over a year.
Bull. But we've already figured out you don't know the difference between released into a sponsor families care and being in a detention centre