I'll explain why we HAVE seen the Bite of 87 and how the child died in simple steps for you.

I wont say whether I think you're right or wrong, I've learned to avoid shit storms. But I will say that your information isn't perfect

Fnaf minigames take place in 1987 Aside from the screenshot I'm sure you've seen of the TV saying the year is 1983, using the dolls is a poor reason to assume it's the year 1987. The popular rebuttal is that the toys were such a hit, when the new place was established, they made animatronics that the kids liked and wanted to see. However this point is also refuted with another rebuttal of yours (confusing as the timeline of fnaf, I know) but I'll get to that later.

 

The bite victim died in a hospital this doesn't matter. If it did, I'd say people can have IV bags in their own homes. But imo, it doesn't have much to do, either way the brother could still overdose the child with an at-home IV

The animatronics were not walking + explanation This is the weakest of your claims, They could be walking around, cause the bite, then still be walking around and THEN not be allowed to walk around anymore. Or indeed, not be allowed because of the bite.

 

Now for a piece of evidence you omitted in these steps.

Fnaf2 is a prequel, we can all agree on that correct? Why are the old animatronics in disrepair? Why would the new ones need to be "safer" in the first place? If the old ones did nothing wrong, why were they scrapped (literally)? What caused the old ones to want to bite if they had? Surely you've never gone to Jurassic Park in universal (only thing I can think of with animatronics) and had one of the animatronics try and legitimately attack you? Because Fredbear is stationary, it could only bite if the kid was placed in his mouth, as he was. But if we are to agree that fredbear is haunted, Wouldn't it make sense that that, when the murders do happen, the puppet's posession sparks the next bite?   also, just a small detail that's probably negligible, didn't the bite of 87 happen in public? Like, in front of people? The only people present are the brother and his friends, I doubt any of them are "phone guy".

 

I'm just throwing things out there, I feel like the reason Scott doesn't just come out and say what the real story is, is because he prefers it be open to interpretation, whether or not it's right doesn't matter because there is no "right" answer, or at least the right answer doesn't matter. But if there's one thing I HAVE learned from fnaf2, it's that Scott knows how to throw off his audience.

/r/fivenightsatfreddys Thread