First of all, even though I will be calling it one for the sake of consistency, this is not a fully fledged theory, because the game is not out yet. It is a prediction I have had ever since the trailer came out. I have spoken with numerous people for help with evidence, and trust me, it's not just some joke theory. I've kept it quiet on Reddit for a reason. I teased it somewhat today, and now people are insulting me left and right, someone even calling me "sick", which is... a bit far. So I'm going to try and clear this up just a bit. As a disclaimer, in case you are young (which is very probable after what I've seen here today), this theory involves adult themes. I'm not going to be showing any nudity or sex, but I will be talking about things which may be inappropriate for very young readers. The Sister Location is either a restaurant with a hidden entrance to an adult-themed location, or the Sister Location is a nickname for an adult-themed location. Let me, first of all, talk about the building itself. The gameplay, from what we can gather, will take place underground. The introduction scene in the trailer is very clearly a platform which is moving down. No matter if you see it as an "elevator", or whatever, it is definitely moving underground as you can see lights in the window moving upwards. The phrase "deep below ground" is also stated in the trailer. The location has child themes through props, such as posters, figurines and party lights, however it is NOT safe for children to roam around. There are exposed wires, shaking machinery and floor-level ventilation shafts. If we don't assume anything from outside sources or our own minds... we can also say that the location includes the show stage, the animatronics, and the spotlights for the characters too. So we can say the location has child-like themes, but is still, as mentioned previously, clearly not safe for children themselves to walk around. Maybe that's a stretch, but that's what I can see. Now, I'll talk about the characters. Maybe, this will get my theory across. There is a female, little girl animatronic, with pigtails and a red dress. Called "Baby". Called, "BABY". You don't call a character who can talk, walk, sing, "Baby", unless there is something else going on, in my opinion. Baby is a word used for either... actual babies, or it's used as a nickname for a lover. If you stop looking at the game face-on, you should be able to agree with that. If you don't, then whatever. Ballora is a half-naked ballerina. She has very exposed breasts, with merely a blue strip of plastic covering the top and front of them. I'm not making that up, and it's been a point of discussion for ages. She "dances" (moves up and down repetitively...), keeps her eyes shut at all times, and has the standard make-up which we are pretty used to by now. Ballora does not exist to entertain children, from what I can tell. Ballerinas wear a lot more than that. Funtime Foxy and Funtime Freddy are not explicitly designed to be adult-themed, nor do they seem to do anything sexual. I won't deny that the name "Funtime" is dodgy however. That's... still, something which seems off. The hand puppet, and the lack of Funtime Foxy's hook is also worth mentioning, but other than that, they seem innocent. Now let me talk to you about the themes and hints we have been given. "Don't hold it against us." "You don't know what we've been through." "Please stay in your seats." "The show is about to begin." "Deep below ground." "Secrets don't keep." "There's a little of me in every body." Come on. I am getting increasingly worried that people are very stubborn with their own theories or repetitive belief of "Scott wouldn't go there", that we might just be ignoring the obvious answer. Is this obvious? I don't know, maybe I'm just overthinking it. But are you joking? How are people not seeing the adult implications with these phrases? This is not subtle, this is... Very clearly talking about something more than a pizzeria. Now, let me clarify, Scott WOULD go there. I need to make sure people understand that I am not predicting animatronics having sex with each other, or the player, in this game. Instead, we would be witnessing the aftermath of a disgusting ritual of fetishism and abuse. Is that normal? Hell no, but it's not going to be a normal game. "You don't know what we've been through." We know a lot. We know what a LOT of animatronics have been through. We know, in FNAF2, that animatronics who are presumably haunted, have been installed with facial recognition to determine whether someone is a PREDATOR or not. That word is used. Not a criminal, not a vandal, not a murderer. A predator. We know about children being lured, killed, stuffed into suits. We know about bullies pushing a child into an animatronic head, letting him die in a hospital while having nightmares of robot-human hybrids with hundreds of teeth. We know about restless souls trying to escape facilities, we know about a man who was punctured into a suit, bleeding out in a room that was MADE for people to die in silence. But we don't know what THEY'VE been through? Why wouldn't Scott do worse? Why wouldn't he go there? Are you that naive, to dismiss a theory with evidence, because you don't think a game developer would mention something like this? They have speakers on their chest. There is a control panel to control robotics. We have just been given a timetable which has likely hinted that animatronics can be BOOKED, and PRIVATISED. This is more than just "an animatronic strip club."