I have no stake in China. Except to

Defend their one-party authoritarianism if it gives you a chance to shit on your own country.

However, 1 of 3 is a weird way to say the highest court in the land is controlled by a party until a few deaths.

"A party" is such a great choice of words on your part.

The same court who can overturn decades of legal precedents.

Yes, that's how the system of checks and balances works. It's meant to prevent any one party from gaining total control overnight and solidifying that control, preventing any dissent, in perpetuity.

Speaking of decades, Jim Crow laws lasted a century.

I'm well aware of that. My own parents' marriage would have been illegal only about a decade before they actually had the ceremony. But what are you trying to imply here? That the end of the CCP's brand of Han Chinese nationalist fascism is just a few decades away?