India's government has asked YouTube to remove all links to a controversial documentary about the gang rape and murder of a woman in Delhi after banning its broadcast.

The fact is that lots of people are raped, and many of them are women. Many of those women talk about the things they find intimidating, and then men like you go to absurd lengths to discredit them because you are ultradefensive.

Let's repeat your own quote back again with it changed to a racial issue...

The Main objection I have to Anti-Racists and similar folk is they don't seem to understand is that black people can be scary. You don't need to be a mugger. There's enough muggers out there that if you make a racist comment, or catch a white person by themselves, they can reasonably believe you may wish to mug them.

You think a statement like that isn't racist?

Only MRAs like yourself are saying the argument is about "All men are rapists".

Amazing. Absolutely amazing strawman you've presented.

But people like you are not open to dialogue

So far your "dialogue" is that people not thinking cat calling is part of a nonexistent rape culture means they support that rape culture.

Oh, and blaming MRA's for feminists thinking men are scary rapists.

Your rape hysteria isn't backed by crime statistics or basic reality. It's a delusion. And your "dialogue" is declaring that the very idea that we shouldn't encourage women to think all men are rapists isn't sexist or insane and only proves your rape culture claims.

That you actually think people using arguments for due process are "part of the problem" because "rapists" use those arguments in court is a pretty big issue. What dialogue do you want on that? In what way is due process and legal defense suddenly an argument in support of rape?

Red Pillers

So on top of thinking men are "scary rapists" because they are men, now you're desperately trying to attribute Red Pillers to the Mens Rights movement, despite having absolutely nothing to do with each other and the MRM existing outside of Reddit?

That is a virulent and dangerous idea.

That idea comes from a social norm, especially in non-American European countries, where women will say "no" and expect you to continue attempting to persuade them (that you use "" for persuade is quite telling on how absurd you're getting if you think persuade means to force). Right or wrong they base it on a social norm, not on a physical view.

leering man dog you for 2 hours of an evening, expressing all the sexual things he would like to do to you,

Lets just recap for a moment that you're now declaring "leering" as part of "rape culture". In a comment section that began when a user stated...

I know reddit loves to regurgitate how all womyn are feminazis who think eye contact = actual rape, but that's not really true in the real world outside of circlejerks and tumblr.

You're actually defending "eye rape" as a thing.

Second, despite the creepiness of that, unless you shout them out (something that study after study is shown to actually work) it is harmless unless they invade your personal space.

Third, the prevalence of this is almost nonexistent. Which is why the best "examples" feminists like you bring up are '10 Hours of People Saying Hi and Hello'.

Crime is down. Sexual violence is down. Rape is down. Domestic violence is down.

Yet hysteria regarding this is getting to an all time high.

You're seeing rape everywhere and then justifying your insane sexism on that same hysteria. People would love to have a dialogue. But you refuse to because everything anyone says just proves you right.

/r/worldnews Thread Link - hindustantimes.com