I'm a bit confused here,

You wouldn't be if you were paying attention, but I bet you're going to be responding to me with attitude and snark. I'm not typing that because I already read your comment.

the context of this discussion is comic book superheroes - are you saying you agree that male superheroes are sexualized?

No, no. Pay attention darling. The argument you were making was that rich, powerful buff men aren't sex fantasies, but men like Edward Cullen are.

I'm responding to that argument by saying that the guys in Twilight have pretty hard to get physiques.

Just like the ones in comic books.

to that image you provided

What image did I provide? Are you fuckin high?

.....

Eat dogshit.

I'm just not sure what your stance is.

My stance is that men like the ones in Twilight are built, hence:

Rich, buff, powerful men aren't female sex fantasies?

Has yet to be properly addressed by you. Cut the snark out of your comments. It makes you seem really cunty.

Plus, Batman's no Justin Timberlake, his only talents are fighting and being humorless.

And being rich and successful, which is what sells shit like Fifty Shades of Grey faster than they can print books. Because it's the sex fantasy women have.