• Rapist, known as Amir A, 20, said he attacked boy in a 'sexual emergency'
• He had not had sex in four months, so dragged him into changing rooms
• Supreme Court in Austria now say prosecution did not prove the rape claim
• They want harder evidence the boy, 10, was forced to act against his will

Not even Germany and its mashedtogetherwordsofwtfitude have the necessary language to describe just how truly fucked up this court decision is.

because the Austrian court 'didn't prove he realised the boy was saying no'

...

But the Supreme Court rescinded the sentence and ordered a re-trial with the court's president Thomas Philipp calling the verdict 'watertight' when it came to the sexual assault of a child, but that rape could not be sufficiently proved, says The Local.

The higher court said it should have been ascertained whether or not the victim agreed to the sexual act or whether Amir A had acted against the will of the boy.

Ignorance is apparently a defense against rape in Austria.