- Ok you guys really need to work on your spelling because this shit is border line unreadable.
I am not English native speaker; so I don't claim my English to perfect. If you didn't understand what I meant, you can ask me to calify it to you. Fixation on such irrelevant matters makes you look like a child, nothing more.
I'm sorry do you think I'm saying people don't die because of the Taliban or Islamic based violence? I'm not. I'm just saying that there's a reason for those attacks and it's not because of Islam the idea or religion. (read my other comments for further explanation)
You made an argument that since small precentage of Muslims engage in terrorism, then Islam is not the cause.
No you can't and if you can, please do.
Nearly all the word was colonized at some point, but look at how what is the precentage of terrorists among human beings.
We can look at the case of indea and Pakistan; all the land was under British colonization, then they gave indea and Pakistan independence. Britain now has some population from the two countries. I want you to look indean terrorist attacks and compare it Pakistan's.
- I mean it's not because a "phenemena" is something that came out of nowhere and that we don't how it happened, we know exactly where "Islamic" terrorism came from and how it happened
1 - that isn't the definition of phenomena. Nothing came from nowhere.
2 - Noone said it came from nowhere; it came from Islam. Muslims for 1400 years engaged in violence with all forms.
don't even know what your trying to say
Then you could have asked me. Because I didn't mean that.
mean I could think of 20 different countries and era's which
The truth is indeed before the othman rule the Islamic world was more advenced than Europe. But during it Europe made its scientific revolution while the othman forbod even the printing. Napoleon defeated them and took Egypt in the battle of pyramids in 1 or 2 hours. Someone has to review his history books.
your wrong and they rebelled because it say a chance to take over the entire Ottoman empire
They repbelled because they knew it was a failure. That is my point.
You clearly didn't understand what I was trying to say. "Islamic" terrorism is the same as nationalist terrorism but Islam replaces the nation due a lack of national pride since most nations were a part of another country for about 450 years, hence turning to Islam to give a sense a unity and nationalistic pride
I still don't understand how talking about fall of othman t is suppose to explain American, Australian, Dutch, French, German and Japanese converts supporting terrorism.
had recruits with Irish heritage
You said it yourself Irish not catholic.
No it's not. It's because their not enough evidence to warrant it because as mentioned before, 0.0000042% of a population isn't enough to say theirs something inherently wrong with the beliefs of that population
Terrorists attacks is rare phenomena. Because engaging in it is almost suicide. But for some reason Muslims like it more than others.
That's like me saying "look at all the Neo-Nazi's in America and Europe so there's clearly a problem with American and European beliefs on freedom.
If precentage of Neo-Nazies in America is greater than its of other countries, we will say so.
Overall you look to have a lot of free time and patience. I expect more silly reply from you; but don't expect my reply to you before tomorrow Isa.