Although I greatly condemn the attacks, or any likewise initiative, I need to say the following;
Some school reports regarding 'Dzhokhar' referred to the kid as 'having a heart of gold'. In many photos we can see a friendly happy kid. Seemingly untroubled.
When we look at terrorism, we can clearly see the warnings of our own people, say Ron Paul, in certain cases even more than a decade before its happening in the 'western world' that connected the probability of such to occur to our definition of money and resulting effects from this system.
Even presidents, say Carter (but not just), have warned up to including the Senate (and in many other places too), for this same monetary system.
Mathematicians, economists, bankers up to the upmost successful people of our world have warned us for the realities of this system.
To my great concern I expect egoism to be one of the logical results of this system. At least we can see this 'only thinking of oneself' increasingly occur, statistically proven, and with it we see the rise of violence. I think, as a reaction to effects like this.
Because egoism threatens any society. How can one live in a group only thinking of themselves? That is not how groups function and how they are formed, why they are formed. It jeopardizes all that is about the group.
Not just thinking about oneself, does not mean agreeing with everything. It does mean (the will) to ask questions, say before to value, especially other beings even before their efforts. It means the respect to be able to disagree.
Currently, I believe, we see that we're losing the respect to be able to differ of opinion. People demand not just ideas, these must revenue themselves, proof themselves without any question even. We also start to see that people increasingly focus on the looks of it all, presentation, instead of message to which presentation is means. Up to including academically educated people that is, which is anything but scientifically responsible behavior.
How come that we have people within our societies that apparently feel the need to support groups that simply are the enemies of?
How would I, or you, conduct to such without us hating our society? And why would we hate our society? The money won't be a problem, the looks of it I think is much bling bling, who doesn't like to see a bit bling bling shine?
I fear, though, that the core of groups, caring and thinking for each other is jeopardized. And I believe that sensitive, caring people 'with a heart of gold' can easily be the first to notice and suffer such facts.
I believe that we have enabled business/rewarding models that simply don't reward people to think of one another. Money talks. So many to most of these people will simply refuse to otherwise as what the group expect (show a bit decency, show a bit consideration, SHOW, when necessary). We have enabled people to totally live on their own within groups, sucking out its benefits but not even feeling the slightest bit of need to return anything for it.
In fact, I think it enables our definition of money to address population growth problems, ignorance problems and index say who is against this system. It enables accelerated development (war always results to faster development) and moneymaking, it enables diverting attention of people to effects they consider threats and fear instead of its cause, to my concern, definition of money.
We even see this within politics. Why do our politics not function as we appointed and wished? Do they do that on purpose, to nag their electorate? I don't think so, I think they're sandwiched between a whole lot of people because of egoism, we want to pick our choice once in four or five years, we don't want to check it up though, we're not rewarded for it. Egoism. We like to put others in front of our car, we mock results, we never helped though while they had to decide about HUGE interests, we've most often completely let them down during such decisive periods. We can simply proof the lobby of industry to be SO MUCH stronger than the (lobby of) majority interest, that it simply proofs the same egoism.
Maybe we need to consider these things a bit more often.
Because I never support such attacks, such bombing, such violence, but I do believe that it has something to do with our societies definition of money, that we've been warned for long ago. I do believe it leads to effects such as egoism that will very negatively affect caring and sensitive people.
Let me just put a simple example;
Some people tend to put sensitivity as weakness. I think this cannot be true, I think sensitive people are the first to notice problems, the first to pop up with solutions, because of their sensitivity.
We also see that if things are a bit too different to our perception, we suddenly figure it needs to answer for itself, without us asking questions. That means that we won't easily allow things to be different anymore.. Let me put the following hypothetical example;
If we are in currently increasing problematic situation, it cannot stay the same, for it will most probably lead to more of problematic situation. In order to become less problematic, something needs to change, be different. In order to be able to do so, we need to allow differences, by asking questions and understanding before to value.
I think we see the opposite right now, I think we see that we rather have leaders that caress our ears, tell us what we want to hear instead of what we need to hear. At the moment people confront us with disadvantages we don't want to consume, we start to value, and not at point of arguments.
Discussions make no sense if rather the looks of it than content / arguments are considered. It is just time/effort/money thrown away like this. And yes, it is a personal adult responsibility. Of anybody that enters the discussion table, everywhere, whether it is on reddit or within political circles.
I rather wish us a leader that stutters although does the right thing, than one who has filmstar looks but doesn't function.
Leaders are not showbiz.
We want leaders exactly as we like to see them, but we don't have leaders for how they look, we have models for that.
I think we really need be a bit fast to realize these things. And not point to others, people who want to solve problems do that first before to point. People who point rather want others to pull their car.
If not, I fear we're not even close to seeing the end of 'terrorism'.
Of upmost importance, I believe, is our definition of money herein. More of causing than anything else, and no it is not one single person. And no, it are not banks, banks are the bag in which this money resides, not even its definition. And no, also not rich people, they just live according to some definition of. And no, no politicians, we should have checked them up.
No, the majority of people instead. That I believe needs to become a bit more caring, especially for their own good, and start checking up what they talk about or believe in.
TL;DR - this cannot be told shortly. Of course, would be cool if we could explain everything twitter style, doesn't work that way. You can freely hop on or read it, it is a very global description of what I think terrorism comes from. Thank you.