Well, it depends. You could argue someone should have the right to determine how they die. Their body, their choice.

I don’t support that line of logic; however, you could argue this.

For example, let’s assume someone someone has an injury and becomes bed ridden as a quadriplegic. They cannot move on their own. They are conscious creatures stuck in the prison of their mostly paralyzed body. Is it morally wrong for them to end their own suffering? Is it morally right to not let them make decisions about their life, their body?

Everybody dies. Is it morally right to prevent someone from determining how they do?

I agree with you, when it comes to the contradiction you pointed out, it is morally right for bodily autonomy to be negated by preventative measures.

Why?