Can you explain what you mean by this? Perhaps cite something?

Are you aware of what the FEC is? well here's your homework, see if my roughly 3x is outlandish. It's all on that site.

Clinton has been publicly against the TPP for two years. Do you even follow the news? Or do you just make stuff up based on whatever you think your echo chamber would like to hear?

yes, she herself has said it hasn't met her standard, but the DNC still voted for the TPP, it is still part of there platform. Since the voting she hasn't answered a single TPP inquiry. Not even at the 2nd debate, where she could have very firmly dispelled any doubt. It's likely to get passed where it is called TPP or not It will have the same end result.

Do you follow international relations at all? You can't seriously think there is "zero reason" to play tough with Russia.

You're defending the no-fly zone right now. How is that better than a sanction? Which has worked with moderate success for Obama already. there's a difference between just jerking russia around riling up cold war-esque rhetoric for the media and handling a situation.

Can you rephrase this into something resembling a coherent thought?

My bad, I had forgotten we live in a perfect fair and just republic. Bank lobbying power and sweetheart deals are conspiratorial in nature and I crossed a line.

Or do you just make stuff up based on whatever you think your echo chamber would like to hear?

I liked the jab, I think you'd find in my comment history that asides from it being painfully boring an engaging, I like to post in situations I know I will be confronted in. If you only surround yourself with one opinion that is a hive mind tendency.