Koil on Ludwig accepting Fansly Sponsorships

if you werent such a dumbass you'd know, that I never used quotations (which are btw marked/used with "") nor did I paraphrase what he said. I simply summarized in my own words what he said in the clip. And you also might have notice that you managed to mention twice how I'm "making shit up" (quotaion) aswell as stating that you "don't know what clip" I am watching but never managed what in your certified and superior opinion the clip is about. You only managed copy paste some definitions from wikipedia. You're completely missing what the clip is about (which I asked but you didn't fucking answer) the definition of consent and objectification are not up for debate here. The focal point of his take is again the hypocrisy of streamers, critizising objectification and sexualisation but advertising completely consentual sex work. TO SUM IT UP he says that its hypocritical to critizise unconsentual nsfw content (as you said objectification "does not mention Consent") but advertise consentual content (which is not objectification and thus consentual).

Now that again I'm unironically really interested in what you think the clip is about. I hope we both can agree that its about Koils take on ludwik running fansly ads and if thats true, please don't come up with any defintion but just tell me how you interpret his take.

/r/LivestreamFail Thread Parent Link - clips.twitch.tv