Seek out the God of the Gaps argument from him, which is in every debate he has. He explains it in almost every publication and work he has put out.

In his debate with Dawkings and Krauss, even Hitchens and a few others, they all believe God is like Zeus. That he is a made god, a lesser deity of this or that. Dawkings was schooled on it because he didn't read the Bible or any other religion's work to know that isn't how those religion folk view God or what God's own explanation for what he actually is.

Dawkings was like "Huh, what? Derrrppp, when Lennox explained the God of the Gaps to him and you can almost taste the light bulb go off in his head when he was educated on it.

Not saying Lennox is correct, because he'd got some funky ass views for sure. But anyone is capable of ousting others on specific topics. Lennox is a weird and funny guy who just happened to see a big error in Dawkings and Krauss's work, he ousted them and did a great job using factual objective info to uncover their agenda. Despite that, he still has some odd views, but that isn't at all relevant.

I'm not as smart as Hawking, but if he makes a math error that I go re-check and that nobody else on Earth wanted to check...I can still oust him for the error despite his IQ being higher than mine. Lol. Essentially, that is what Lennox did to them. He isn't as smart as them and I am not debating his theories, I am just saying this guy found some stupid stuff in the atheist works of the God Delusion and Krauss's book. He was objectively correct, went to read them twice and Lennox was indeed telling the truth. Dawking and Krauss are not and neither are any of the few others here who said these guys detailed tiers of nothing and definitions of nothing in their books. It didn't happen, none of them cited the page or quote and can't, yet insist it's there.

It isn't.