(which this sub loves to insult)

Way too much generalization

editorial opinion piece from a retired adviser's point of view about how the Russians' are going to take NATO expansion.

No right in the first sentence

So when I reached George Kennan by phone to get his reaction to the Senate's ratification of NATO

This is his own opinion.

It had nothing to do with the official US point of view at all.

I never said that unless you show me where I wrote that

Obviously that wasn't "The West's" point of view, because.. you know.. we obviously expanded the alliance.

The West is not a monolithic bloc.

When I was in the 90s there was alot of debates and that was an headlines pretty much everywhere.

And obviously that wasn't any of the new NATOs' point of view, because kn do they care about that guy?

Again I never wrote that, of course they did not care about that until it was too late.

This is exactly why today any Eastern expansion of NATO and the EU is close.

The German are working on a new security agreement with the Russians while letting the alliance consolidate in the Balkans.

The sad true is that Ukriane , Georgia and Moldova got drop

Yes I have proof

There was an AMA in /r/geopolitics with the London of Economics foreign Affairs experts.

You need to understand that there are many, many, many different opinions out there.

I understand but your points were moot.

I even took my time to take every one of your sentence and to explain why it is wrong with facts and proof. You never told where I was wrong.

If Russia is to cooperate and have civil relations with the international community then it's going to have to learn that.

Diplomatic and technocratic language who mean nothing.

Oh the old boring time when I was force to translate and to write statements. Dont worry for Russia , foreign policy it something they know how to master.