Okay so People saying okay we can't explain x but x would make sense if we were in a simulation isn't evidence towards that .

Then saying okay well we have molecules that behave differently when we view them and we don't understand that but x would make sense if we were in a simulation , but again that's not evidence to support the idea and theory.

Got it.

So we never saw a black hole. But we had a theory because evidence supported the theory and now we have a picture to prove one of the theories was correct.

You are still back at well we can't see a black hole so there is no evidence

And Iam at okay show me the picture.

Scientific theory starts with someone having an idea and then building evidence based on this theory like you know molecules acting different when we view them , or a few other things .

Yes it's all theory but it's being talked about so saying there is no evidence is you just saying well I don't consider what these scientists are saying is evidence to support their theory.

I'd link more shit but at this point I guess we just agree to disagree